Monday, September 9, 2013

AP Psych Week 2

In my opinion the biological approach is the most concrete due to the fact that it can be proven scientifically. Genetics is a a branch of biology and determine almost all factors of an offspring's body and mind.  To say one has more fat cells in their body makes sense due to heredity from the parents and genetics because thats how they were born.  When the subject was stated about the level of weight dropping below a certain weight causing the hunger to increase and metabolism to slow down makes sense as well.  To say it's evolutionarily required to survive is kind of skewed.  Although a "healthier" weight is better than a "skinnier" weight, the concept of obesity can cause many levels of sickness and physical restrictions.  The one thing I disagree with is how obesity is determined more commonly by BMI.  Many NFL players are considered "obese" through BMI tests yet they are some of the most physicaly fit athletes around?  A metabolism is a genetic trait that is different for everyone as well. One person cant just simply change their metabolism as they please?  If we could, i dont think the level of obesity would be anywhere near what it is now because people would self-regulate their metabolisms and simply eat whatever they please and not change physically whatsoever.  Either way, I feel the biological approach is the most concrete because it can be scientifically proven.  The Evolutionary approach is kind of skewed because a heavier person can experience more and more physical and health issues if they "store more energy" than they spend.  The sociocultural approach can be somewhat concrete because of the influence our environment has upon us.

Another approach I feel might provide more rationale for obesity as well is the humanistic approach.  We grow up, just as Mr. Womack stated, learning to "clean our plates" and that the older the subject, the more they tend to eat because of how they were raised through both their parents and their environment.  So by default we feel the urge to finish everything we are given no matter the serving size provided.  Another approach I feel would also provide a rationale is the cognitive approach.  The human mind can control its eating habits if its really determined too.  I feel sometimes, that people just dont care enough to "take care of themselves" and watch what they eat so they gain weight and after a while become overweight and maybe obese because of it.

9 comments:

  1. Nick, although I chose a different perspective, you make some good point for biological. However, why I do agree that you can inherent these weight factors, obesity can also be the result of your personal choice of food and lack of exercise. I feel that it goes both ways. Also, your comment on the BMI was smart, and I feel that BMI doesn't give you the full story behind someones weight compared to their body type.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I agree a portion of obesity is due to genetics, I firmly believe that the root cause is one's life style choices. Our bodies do have a sort of set weight that it will try to cling to but when it comes to someone who is three-hundred and fifty pounds and stands at 5'6.... well that's simply not very natural. I do, though, agree that the rise of obesity may simply be learned, our society focuses highly on consumerism and I believe that American industries focus on selling a product, despite the toxic fillers and metabolically harming chemicals, therefore our environment and social stand point does contribute to our health crisis

    ReplyDelete
  3. NIck, I appreciate your comments on a "healthy" weight compared to a "skinny" weight. Today, there is too much association between the two, being too skinny is just as harmful as being overweight. In regards to your views on the biological approach and the evolutionary approach, I believe it should not be forgotten that they go hand in hand. When looking at the biology of something, it is important and resourceful to understand the evolution of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Apple Nart,
    I agree the biological approach is best, because our society pushes being skinny as well as eating food. You made me consider whether or not animals suffer from similar weight problems if food is abundant. That would give us insight into which perspective is best. If animals do not over eat when given unlimited food then the biological approach is invalid and the humanistic approach should be used.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Apple Nart,
    I agree the biological approach is best, because our society pushes being skinny as well as eating food. You made me consider whether or not animals suffer from similar weight problems if food is abundant. That would give us insight into which perspective is best. If animals do not over eat when given unlimited food then the biological approach is invalid and the humanistic approach should be used.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nick,

    You raise a very tantalizing point about NFL players that I had not previously considered. While a normal person weighing the same as a lineman might be considered obese, the athlete is given more room because that is what is considered 'normal'. Your analysis of the biological perspective makes me consider this approach a valid one.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Goin along with Alexander's address,
    Apple Nart,
    I chose to blog about the social cultural perspective, but you have made some very valid claims. I agree with you that genetics can be a very major factor in obesity. Additionally, your differentiation between a "'healthier' weight" and a "'skinnier' weight" effectively got the point across that being healthy is not all about losing weight. That it's more about eating right and exercising regularly.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nick,
    Although I chose a different perspective, your blog made good points on the biological approach. I really agree with your opinion on the BMI scale. Some people just are heavier from their muscle mass because they have taken care of their bodies by eating right and exercising. Genetics do play a very large role in obesity but there are many cases where a parent is obese and the child is very healthy.

    ReplyDelete
  9. King Apple Nart, King of the Orchard and conqueror of Citrus,

    First off, may I give you a cheer for your choice of psychological approach to obesity. I found myself nodding with your genetics statement. As someone of a slight build, (sadly the viking ancestors didn't leave the viking physique,) it becomes a herculean challenge for me to gain even five pounds. Which seems to be converse to the population as a whole, but the point stays he same. Genetics lies at fault for the issue of weight, for people big and small. Somewhere I read that the obesity crisis is literal evolution in action, and that now our metabolisms must lower to allow us to live longer. While that claim is up for discussion, I wholeheartedly concur that the source of this epidemic is largely biological. Nice job King Apple Nart.

    Your friend and light hearted nuisance,
    The Pony Lord Khal Dobeck

    ReplyDelete